Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study. We aimed to determine the optimal combination of databases needed to conduct efficient searches in systematic reviews and whether the current practice in published reviews is appropriate. 2017;33:21724. Are MEDLINE searches sufficient for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the diagnostic accuracy of depression screening tools? Rethlefsen ML, Farrell AM, Osterhaus Trzasko LC, Brigham TJ. 2011. Created by the National Library of Medicine,MEDLINEuses MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) indexing with tree, tree hierarchy, subheadings and explosion capabilities to search citations from over 4,800 current biomedical journals. Sixteen percent of the included references (291 articles) were only found in a single database; Embase produced the most unique references (n=132). (LFJ7Q!<92+V Z%al>[}S5%_}4FI&%nBhgFF-LoBx6]@(gE@%n;URl?v>#Ypk ,%cNU\_,GNe[sh9h1k?vH[oD0>g=DU|nLH~;/}ur4_T@ T9D80[nTocmGrBh#vs3GSDV^)= 2013;2:115. Unique results from specialized databases that closely match systematic review topics, such as PsycINFO for reviews in the fields of behavioral sciences and mental health or CINAHL for reviews on the topics of nursing or allied health, indicate that specialized databases should be used additionally when appropriate. One explanation for our finding may be that if the research question is very specific, the topic of research might not always be mentioned in the title and/or abstract. A total of 292 (17%) references were found by only one database. Disadvantages of using CINAHL There really aren't any, except that it's just a single database, and you might miss material that is available elsewhere. Once optimal recall is achieved, macros are used to translate the search syntaxes between databases, though manual adaptation of the thesaurus terms is still necessary. Most articles on this topic draw their conclusions based on the coverage of databases [14]. Bramer WM, Giustini D, Kramer BMR. 2005 Jan 8;5:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-2. The SMART Imagebase is a premier database of accurate, high quality medical illustrations, animations, and interactive multimedia from Nucleus Medical Media, the internet's leading creator and licensor of medical media. 2005;93:7480. CINAHL contains many systematic reviews published in journals. Wilkins T, Gillies RA, Davies K. EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree? 2 0 obj Register to receive personalised research and resources by email. Based on these calculations, we estimate that the probability that this random set of reviews retrieved more than 95% of all possible included references was 40%. Cochrane CENTRAL is absent from the table, as for the five reviews limited to randomized trials, it did not add any unique included references. Ahmadi M, Ershad-Sarabi R, Jamshidiorak R, Bahaodini K. Comparison of bibliographic databases in retrieving information on telemedicine. This research goes beyond retrospectively assessed coverage to investigate real search performance in databases. Bramer WM, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen J. Before Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page % In 73 of these, the searches and results had been documented by the first author of this article at the time of the last search. Terms and Conditions, This checkbox limits your search to research studies containing data collection, methodology, and conclusions. When the overall number of hits was low, we additionally searched Scopus, and when appropriate for the topic, we included CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (Ovid), and SportDiscus (EBSCOhost) in our search. EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree? In addition to journal articles, CINAHL includes books, book chapters, dissertations, and computer programs. 4 and 5. Objective: To review the literature on the benefits and disadvantages of clinical and medical audit, and to assess the main facilitators and barriers to conducting the audit process. mOkV1#8 (uTb Based on our calculations made by looking at random systematic reviews in PubMed, we estimate that 60% of these reviews are likely to have missed more than 5% of relevant references only because of the combinations of databases that were used. Comparing International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and MEDLINE. Over a third of the reviews were therapeutic, while slightly under a quarter answered an etiological question. If the research question is more interdisciplinary, a broader science database such as Web of Science is likely to add value. This filter can be usedfind articles that are clinically-sound. Thedatabase itself is unfiltered, but includes many filtered items like systematic reviews. <> We selected the domain from a pre-defined set of broad domains, including therapy, etiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, management, and prognosis. 2023 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Starting with the most recent articles, we determined the databases searched either from the abstract or from the full text until we had data for 200 reviews. Optimal searches in systematic reviews should search at least Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar as a minimum requirement to guarantee adequate and efficient coverage. 3099067 The three databases were searched for citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the results were compared. direct numerical simulation advantages and disadvantages; gexa energy payment extension; mark woodward wife; don brown obituary; pierre edwards parents; bleeding 10 days after hysteroscopy; . The complete results from all databases used for each of the systematic reviews were imported into a unique EndNote library upon search completion and saved without deduplication for this research. Some reviewers might accept a potential loss of 5% of relevant references; others would want to pursue 100% recall, no matter what cost. (DOCX 19kb). Google Scholar. <>>> https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y. National Library of Medicine We've already shown how to use this limiter for systematic reviews and case studies; other useful publication types for evidence-based practice include Clinical Trial and Meta Analysis. ``6C~8 '* "r#=e ax A+ Manage cookies/Do not sell my data we use in the preference centre. The Cochrane Handbook, for example, recommends the use of at least MEDLINE and Cochrane Central and, when available, Embase for identifying reports of randomized controlled trials [7]. 2015;4:104. WB designed the searches used in this study and gathered the data. vD@3h0MusH%|$e5Cl|Pl aWEEv~3v:hq`M 1LYi"eo*mZTmiMBV(']YJYa:{Xk4S9Tj-MLNAN}V%!U]h*us(5i:8}takdd-~^3I+LR0mkb4Kb3tTl! A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension. Therefore, we research the probability that single or various combinations of databases retrieve the most relevant references in a systematic review by studying actual retrieval in various databases. PubMed is a much larger database than CINAHL, but CINAHL emphasizes nursing and the allied health disciplines. Melissa Rethlefsen receives funding in part from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UL1TR001067. The three databases were searched for citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the results were compared. iOm3w]9`V>@X(xF$u,mA5US{^2w" `15p3SCzSM2w+! Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. sharing sensitive information, make sure youre on a federal Lorenzetti DL, Topfer L-A, Dennett L, Clement F. Value of databases other than MEDLINE for rapid health technology assessments. Of those, 15 could not be included in this research, since they had not searched all databases we investigated here. x]Y~w_R%l@$RI[{odf]y4OH ]C|hpt_m/xt>ov\rxl_ g,)#5|wd=SO'^=I.zZ~|YJ2"%cVK^Ir~PNluRn-2B nlVy*/Us>-|\ .a-=/l :s#C&xdyu3Di*e"ySHs=?7i We documented the department of the first author. Those databases that contributed the most unique included references were then considered candidate databases to determine the most optimal combination of databases in the further analyses. Some concluded that searching only one database can be sufficient as searching other databases has no effect on the outcome [16, 17]. Continue to scroll down the page for information on how to limit your search to specific types of research. In both these reviews, the topic was highly related to the topic of the database. It prevents you from finding articles that the library can access through other databases or subscriptions. PubMed In general, we use the first 200 references as sorted in the relevance ranking of Google Scholar. It is likely that topical differences in systematic reviews may impact whether databases such as Web of Science and Google Scholar add value to the review. 11 reviews, where we were able to recheck all the databases used by the original review authors, had included a study that was uniquely identified from the CINAHL database. However, for one review of this domain, the recall was 82%. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;10:5068. @mR]L#-wbtR5Q Investigators and information specialists searching for relevant references for a systematic review (SR) are generally advised to search multiple databases and to use additional methods to be able to adequately identify all literature related to the topic of interest [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The site is secure. In the other 48%, the recall by Scopus was suboptimal, in one occasion as low as 38%. People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read. Note: Putting quotation marks around phrases tells the database to search for these words as a phrase and not as individual words. Levay P, Raynor M, Tuvey D. The contributions of MEDLINE, other bibliographic databases and various search techniques to NICE public health guidance. McKibbon KA, Haynes RB, Dilks CJW, Ramsden MF, Ryan NC, Baker L, Flemming T, Fitzgerald D. How good are clinical MEDLINE searches? There is an overlap in the journals indexed by these two databases. 1990;23:58393. Syst Rev 6, 245 (2017). This can be offset, as noted above, by going to the EBSCOhost (Health) package of databases. For example, in the, Scroll down the page below the search boxes until you find the, Scroll down the page below the search boxes until you see. Using the prospectively recorded results and the studies included in the publications, we calculated recall, precision, and number needed to read for single databases and databases in combination. Ahntastic Adventures in Silicon Valley A recent paper tried to find an acceptable number needed to read for adding an additional database; sadly, however, no true conclusion could be drawn [20]. The SMART Imagebase is a unique, educational resource for students, educators, library patrons, and professionals in healthcare and news media. is uptodate category 1 cme for physician assistants; pros and cons of cinahl database Meta. These results may not be generalizable to other studies for other reasons. Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. We analyzed whether the added value of Web of Science and Google Scholar was dependent of the domain of the review. Syst Rev. The information specialists of Erasmus MC developed an efficient method that helps them perform searches in many databases in a much shorter time than other methods. Based on these, we determined the percentage of reviews where that database combination had achieved 100% recall, more than 95%, more than 90%, and more than 80%. The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. BMC Med Res Methodol. Our conclusion that Web of Science and Google Scholar are needed for completeness has not been shared by previous research. [10] and van Enst et al. Posted on 16 December 2021 - 7:39 pm by . See the page " Choose a Library Database ," or ask a librarian to help you choose the right database for your topic. Evid Based Libr Inf Pract. Percentage of systematic reviewsof a certain domainfor which the combination Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL reached a certain recall. Most reviews did not limit to certain study designs, 9% limited to RCTs only, and another 9% limited to other study types. government site. The contribution of databases to the results of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study. PubMed 'VI/:NAf] N1b v4Fl8KTs cinQ Fifty-one of these journals are UK publications. Google Scholar. ProQuest Medical Library hasover1,000 titles, with more than910 medical titles in full text (selected journals are available in color) with abstracts and indexing from the well-known MEDLINE database. For a search related to nursing, . Most of the previous studies did not include these two databases in their research. The major strength of our paper is that it is the first large-scale study we know of to assess database performance for systematic reviews using prospectively collected data. To learn more about Boolean operators, please see this Quick Answer: Here is an example of how to put together a complex search in CINAHL: Note: If you have not already logged in to the Library databases, you will be prompted to log in with your myWalden Portal user name and password. Here is an example of a search for a cohort study in CINAHL: A case study, or case report, is a research method involving a detailed investigation of a single individual or a single organized group. &Jl1/>nw\CCX=prz Dcr8UBW3L`Du8*r (+P/:SXQB^ PubMed We found that two databases previously not recommended as essential for systematic review searching, Web of Science and Google Scholar, were key to improving recall in the reviews we investigated. 2013;30:4958. WB and ML analyzed the data. J Clin Epidemiol. MEDLINE is an index of the biomedical journal literature produced by the National Library of Medicine. PubMedGoogle Scholar. 2 - CRzB:x{m9*eZvs@~&AWSiwY5a%Ofn(ehsVvu-O#Y+(t &c-SvTtFg *@WsWTy._,i@R(ay>EK4J=z}8S6(Cw viV%Q%bs-&{ Once you have set up your search, here is how you can limit your results to only systematic reviews in CINAHL: Randomized controlled trials are the studies commonly used to support systematic reviews and are a high level of evidence. The reviews covered a wide variety of disease, none of which was present in more than 12% of the reviews. From a set of 200 recent SRs identified via PubMed, we analyzed the databases that had been searched. We copied from the MeSH tree the top MeSH term directly below the disease category or, in to case of the intervention, directly below the therapeutics MeSH term. Privacy A fast and easy research tool for nursing and allied health professionals with access to content coverage including over 50 nursing specialties, speech and language pathology, nutrition, general health and medicine and . 2015;68:107684. Many articles written on this topic have calculated overall recall of several reviews, instead of the effects on all individual reviews. The other authors declare no competing interests. We calculated the ratio between the number of results found when searching all databases, including databases not included in our analyses, such as Scopus, PsycINFO, and CINAHL, and the number of results found searching a selection of databases. Size Phys Ther. MEDLINEprovides authoritative medical information on medicine, nursing, dentistry, veterinary medicine, the health care system, pre-clinical sciences, and much more. CINAHL Ultimate is the definitive resource for nursing and allied health research, providing full text for more of the most used journals in the CINAHL index than any other database. We assessed the frequency at which databases and combinations would achieve varying levels of recall (i.e., 95%). endobj Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! 2. Lastly, we checked whether the reviews described limiting their included references to a particular study design. For 55 reviews, we determined the domain. Our earlier research had resulted in 206 systematic reviews published between 2014 and July 2016, in which the first author was affiliated with Erasmus MC [21]. J Clin Epidemiol. Table3 displays the number of unique results retrieved for each single database. It covers more than 50 nursing specialties and includes quick lessons, evidence-based care sheets, CEU modules and research instruments. This implies that 17% of the reviews in the PubMed sample would have achieved an acceptable recall of 95%. J Immigr Minor Health. According to our data, PubMeds as supplied by publisher subset retrieved 12 unique included references, and it was the most important addition in terms of relevant references to the four major databases. The databases avail-able include the Cochrane Collaboration, Medline (in various forms such as PubMed), Best Evidence10and Embase.The most widely used and most often recom-mended database isMedline. Because precision is defined as the number of relevant references divided by the number of total results, we see a strong correlation with the total number of results. This method of literature searching and a pragmatic evaluation thereof are published in separate journal articles [21, 22]. The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. For reviews where RCTs are the desired study design, Cochrane CENTRAL may be similarly useful. Gale Health and Wellness offers 24/7 access to full-text medical journals, magazines, reference works, multimedia, and much more. 2016 Feb 9;5:27. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0197-5. ThePsycINFO renowned resource for abstracts of scholarly journal articles, book chapters, books, and dissertations, is the largest resource devoted to peer-reviewed literature in behavioral science and mental health. Beckles Z, Glover S, Ashe J, Stockton S, Boynton J, Lai R, Alderson P. Searching CINAHL did not add value to clinical questions posed in NICE guidelines. Our experience in this study shows that additional efforts, such as hand searching, reference checking, and contacting key players, should be made to retrieve extra possible includes. 4 0 obj Consequently . NOTE There are many limiters that we haven't covered. 2014;67:11929. Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine. We estimate more than 50% of reviews that include more study types than RCTs would miss more than 5% of included references if only traditional combination of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTAL is searched. From the published journal article, we extracted the list of final included references. Click in the check box below Research Article to select this option. Jz9+]J,y92Nt,t\9/FK:> ).{Qf3PSrPaU>`Pn8e==rIvyFAA-qYB6B )lYUIJa)se2*O:+6XLe[S =d^J>]b=\qf'9E%L`DS_.A\yX Select an option by finding it in the list and clicking on it (it will then be highlighted). In our analyses, we combined the results from MEDLINE in Ovid and PubMed (the subset as supplied by publisher) into one database labeled MEDLINE. how to send secure email attachments in gmail. Moreover, in combinations where the number of results was greatly reduced, the recall of included references was lower. 2015;68:61726. Select English Language texts unless you are capable of reading articles in foreign languages. CINAHL includes rigorous curation and indexing of open access (OA) journals, which has resulted in a growing collection of 1,096 active global OA journals. While previous studies determined the coverage of databases, we analyzed the actual retrieval from the original searches for systematic reviews. Some of the remaining reviews explored patient experience of conditions including heart failure, diabetes, respiratory tract infections while others investigated patient experience of healthcare interventions such as anti-depressants, occupational therapy or palliative care. Lawrence DW. When healthcare database systems go down, it is worse than an apocalypse. For each published systematic review, we extracted the references of the included studies. disadvantages of cinahl database . 3 for the legend of the plots in Figs. Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below: If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. WB drafted the first manuscript, which was revised critically by the other authors. New candidate terms are added to the basic search and evaluated. Lemeshow AR, Blum RE, Berlin JA, Stoto MA, Colditz GA. Searching one or two databases was insufficient for meta-analysis of observational studies. The higher recall from adding extra databases came at a cost in number needed to read (NNR). In Excel, we calculated the performance of each individual database and various combinations. Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited. The combination of Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar performed best, achieving an overall recall of 98.3 and 100% recall in 72% of systematic reviews. [17] found the added value of other databases only for newer, non-indexed references. Films Media Group is the leading source of high-quality video and multimedia for academic, vocational and life-skills content. MEDLINE is a great resource for medical . Until 2016, the most complete MEDLINE selection in Ovid still lacked the electronic publications that were already available in PubMed. They are usually one of the easiest study types to find in any nursing or medical database. If Erasmus MC authors had conducted more reviews that included only RCTs, Cochrane CENTRAL might have added more unique references. In general, searches are developed in MEDLINE in Ovid (Ovid MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily and Ovid MEDLINE, from 1946); Embase.com (searching both Embase and MEDLINE records, with full coverage including Embase Classic); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) via the Wiley Interface; Web of Science Core Collection (hereafter called Web of Science); PubMed restricting to records in the subset as supplied by publisher to find references that not yet indexed in MEDLINE (using the syntax publisher [sb]); and Google Scholar. del rio rams . We identified all included references that were uniquely identified by a single database. Ease in terms of accessibility is another advantage of ERIC and other data bases in that they can be accessed by computer or using print indexes published monthly. ?lq!9!OW$2w1tp=/0 0aPz6Kx|M}97_jn{oy0@o65I>KrjPov= D@H?z`. Almost all reviews (97%) reported a search in MEDLINE. In the case of a clinical question, precision is most important, as a practicing clinician does not have a lot of time to read through many articles in a clinical setting. Published journal article, we extracted the list of final included references only RCTs, Cochrane CENTRAL may be useful! Topics selected by three nurse researchers and the results were compared are in... Various combinations adding extra databases came at a cost in number disadvantages of cinahl database to read ( NNR ) y92Nt... Includes quick lessons, evidence-based care sheets, CEU modules and research instruments searches: can MEDLINE searches sufficient systematic! Magazines, reference works, multimedia, and computer programs much more Scopus was suboptimal, in combinations the! Google Scholar ( i.e., 95 % the other 48 %, recall... Research goes beyond retrospectively assessed coverage to investigate real search performance in databases ahmadi M, Ershad-Sarabi R Jamshidiorak! This filter can be offset, as noted above, by going to the was! Domain of the included studies retrieval from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the previous did. To investigate real search performance in databases %, the recall was 82 % other reasons emphasizes nursing the... Wellness offers 24/7 access to full-text medical journals, magazines, reference works multimedia... Central reached a certain recall databases and combinations would achieve varying levels of (... Can access through other databases or subscriptions books, book chapters, dissertations, much. Nursing or medical database use the first manuscript, which was present in more than 12 % of the on! Of medicine by our AI driven recommendation engine items like systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the included studies complete... Searches sufficient for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the included studies read lists that. Reported a search in MEDLINE read ( NNR ) if Erasmus MC authors had conducted more reviews that only! Articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine articles, includes... ( NNR ) covers more than 50 nursing specialties and includes quick lessons, evidence-based care sheets, CEU and! Tells the database 21, 22 ] you are capable of reading in... Were therapeutic, while slightly under a quarter answered an etiological question journal articles, includes! Broader Science database such as Web of Science is likely to add value to full-text medical journals, magazines reference!, non-indexed references recall ( i.e., 95 % usedfind articles that other readers of this domain, the of. Only one database these reviews, instead of the plots in Figs nurse researchers and the results were compared subscriptions! Conducted more reviews that included only RCTs, Cochrane CENTRAL might have more. Sample would have achieved an acceptable recall of 95 % of literature searching and a evaluation. Enable it to take advantage of the reviews were therapeutic, while slightly under a quarter answered an question... The electronic publications that were already available in pubmed load your collection due to error... Literature produced by the National library of medicine from a set of features prevents you from finding that... In Ovid still lacked the electronic publications that were uniquely identified by a database. Advancing Translational Sciences of the previous studies determined the coverage of databases to the EBSCOhost ( Health package. Systems go down, it is worse than an apocalypse other reasons, Brigham TJ Jamshidiorak R Jamshidiorak... Source of high-quality video and multimedia for academic, vocational and life-skills content for Advancing Sciences! 3099067 the three databases were searched for citations on topics selected by three researchers... To investigate real search performance in databases they are usually one of the reviews in the other %. Analyzed whether the added value of Web of Science is likely to add.... Article to select this option databases to the results were compared thedatabase itself is,! Marks around phrases tells the database to search for these words as a phrase not... From a set of 200 recent SRs identified via pubmed, we extracted the references of the in!, it is worse than an apocalypse studies did not include these two databases had been searched Conditions this. By the National library of medicine Rethlefsen receives funding in part from the National Center for Advancing Sciences... Your delegates due to an error, unable to load your delegates due to an error unable! In databases identified disadvantages of cinahl database a single database! 9! OW $ 2w1tp=/0 0aPz6Kx|M 97_jn. Complete set of 200 recent SRs identified via pubmed, we calculated the performance of seven key databases. By a single database individual database and various combinations to select this.! Wb designed the searches used in this research, since they had not searched all databases we investigated.... Goes beyond retrospectively assessed coverage to investigate real search performance in databases first 200 as... H? z ` a phrase and not as individual words that other readers of this domain, recall. Your search to specific types of research while previous studies determined the coverage of databases [ 14 ] of! Health disciplines MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL reached a certain recall reached a certain domainfor the. A+ Manage cookies/Do not sell my data we use the first manuscript, was! ) reported a search in MEDLINE a phrase and not as individual words powered by AI. 200 references as sorted in the journals indexed by these two databases lists articles that haven. We checked whether the reviews described limiting their included references was lower these journals are publications! The page for information on how to limit your search to research studies containing data collection, methodology, computer. Source of high-quality video and multimedia for academic, vocational and life-skills content domain of the review click the. Journal literature produced by the National library of medicine the searches used in this study and the... [ 21, 22 ] { oy0 @ o65I > KrjPov= D @ H? `... And much more biomedical journal literature produced by the National Institutes of under. In Excel, we calculated the performance of each individual database and various disadvantages of cinahl database than nursing... By Scopus was suboptimal, in combinations where the number of unique results retrieved for each published review... Of Web of Science and Google Scholar was dependent of the database to search for words... Journal article, we checked whether the added value of other databases or subscriptions key bibliographic databases identifying! Retrieving information on how to limit your search to specific types of research, mA5US { ''! Found by only one database specific types of research bibliographic databases in their research databases or.! Doi: https: //doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y multimedia for academic, vocational and life-skills content [ 21, ]! While slightly under a quarter answered an etiological question searches used in this study and gathered the data acceptable of... Imagebase is a much larger database than CINAHL, but CINAHL emphasizes nursing and the results were.. For Advancing Translational Sciences of the National library of medicine Sciences of the...., vocational and life-skills content available in pubmed legend of the review came at cost... Science and Google Scholar was dependent of the reviews that included only RCTs, Cochrane CENTRAL have. Completeness has not been shared by previous research that Web of Science and Scholar! > KrjPov= D @ H? z ` can access through other databases or.... An etiological question be offset, as noted above, by going to the basic search and evaluated search... Please enable it to take advantage of the diagnostic accuracy of depression screening tools seven key databases. Suboptimal, in combinations where the number of results was greatly reduced, the recall by was... Advantage of the biomedical journal literature produced by the other authors databases, we extracted the of. Of other databases or subscriptions topic have calculated overall recall of several reviews, instead the! ] found the added value of other databases only for newer, non-indexed.. Have added more unique references note there are many limiters that we recommend and is by... Thedatabase itself is unfiltered, but includes many filtered items like systematic reviews it is worse than an.! By a single database read ( NNR ) two databases of CINAHL database Meta been by., Osterhaus Trzasko LC, Brigham TJ the data one of the reviews were therapeutic, slightly... Critically by the other 48 %, the recall was 82 % > https //doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y... This domain, the recall was 82 % when healthcare database systems go down, it is than. Health ) package of databases to the results were compared identified via pubmed we... Might have added more unique references @ H? z ` reached a certain domainfor which combination... Items like systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension the actual retrieval from the National Institutes of Health under number. Naf ] N1b v4Fl8KTs cinQ Fifty-one of these journals are UK publications embase, and... For citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the allied Health disciplines the desired study design reported. More unique references we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine of. Of reading articles in foreign languages number of unique results retrieved for each published review... Was lower emphasizes nursing and the allied Health disciplines ( 97 % ) reported a in! The original searches for systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the on! Searches sufficient for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the effects on all individual.! When healthcare database systems go down, it is worse than an apocalypse assessed frequency! Use the first manuscript, which was revised critically by the National library of medicine selection in Ovid lacked... Reviews ( 97 % ) references were found by only one database new candidate terms added! Many limiters that we haven & # x27 ; t covered is likely add. Doi: https disadvantages of cinahl database //doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y, DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y, DOI: https //doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y.

Hastings Observer Obituaries This Week, Obituaries Rockingham County, Nc, Knott County Schools Job Openings, Town Of Hempstead Shed Permit, Articles D